ceciliaordaz8
By: Jizelle Hernandez, Alejandra Rodriguez, Cecilia Ordaz

Jasmine Philips Meertins, LinkedIn Profile
Overview
Dr. Jasmine Phillips Meertins is an assistant professor in the Department of Communications at California State University, Fullerton, teaching digital foundations and public relations courses. She holds a B.A. in political science from Yale University, an M.A. in international affairs from George Washington University, and a Ph.D. in communication from the University of Miami. Prior to working at CSUF, Dr. Phillips was an assistant professor at Nevada State College, teaching courses such as Public Relations Campaigns, Case Studies in Public Relations, and Social Media. She was also a Director of Education Abroad at Virginia Commonwealth University and Assistant Director of Study Abroad at the University of Miami, where she led marketing communications to promote international program participation. Dr. Phillips conducts research at the intersection of communication, culture, and media, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative methods.
During our interview, we focused on Dr. Phillips’ research study, “Institutional Relational Maintenance Barriers and Perceptions of Relationship Quality Among Women With Incarcerated Partners,” which she conducted with her colleagues, who are also scholars with different academic backgrounds. The study highlights how institutional barriers in the prison system affect the relationship quality of women whose male partners are incarcerated. The research focuses on how these barriers impact women’s emotional connections and perceptions of their romantic and co-parenting relationships. Through both quantitative and qualitative methods, Dr. Phillips and her colleagues found that these barriers contribute to women feeling emotionally distant from their partners.
Q: What inspired you to explore the impact of institutional barriers on relationships of women with incarcerated partners?
This research opportunity came about when a colleague of Dr. Phillips, who works in the criminal justice field, approached her with the idea of collaborating on a research project. Dr. Phillips, a scholar in communications, and her colleague recognized the potential for a collaborative approach to studying issues at the intersection of their two fields. They began brainstorming ideas to find a topic where communication and criminal justice issues overlap. They identified an area of interest: how institutional barriers can impact relationships in the criminal justice system. They specifically discussed how communication challenges within the prison system affect relationships between incarcerated partners and their families. This collaborative process allowed them to develop a unique research topic that combined their expertise, leading to the study of “Institutional Relational Maintenance Barriers and Perceptions of Relationship Quality Among Women With Incarcerated Partners.”
Q: What were the demographic characteristics of your study sample, and how did you select participants?
For her study, Dr. Phillips focused on a predominantly female sample. The critical criteria for inclusion were that the participants had to be non-incarcerated women in a romantic relationship with an incarcerated male partner. Additionally, the women also had to have a child with their incarcerated partner. Dr. Phillips did not exclude participants based on age, race, or other demographic variables. The study aimed to capture diverse experiences and perspectives among women navigating relationships with incarcerated partners by maintaining this broad inclusivity. The study allowed for a more comprehensive understanding of these women’s challenges and relational dynamics.
Q: What specific data collection methods did you use to gather information from participants?
Dr. Phillips and her colleagues did not collect the data for this study. She explained that, as a researcher, she had initially assumed she would always gather her own data. However, she learned that in some cases, researchers analyze pre-existing data rather than collecting it firsthand. Dr. Phillips and her colleagues used data from a broader research project focused on incarceration, parenting, and partnership. Gaining access to interview people who are incarcerated or those visiting jails and prisons can be challenging, so they analyzed the interviews the original study conducted. Overall, learning that analyzing existing data was an option was an important insight for her research approach.
Q: Can you describe the process you went through to develop your survey questions? How did you ensure they accurately captured the participants’ experiences?
Dr. Philips discusses the limited control she had in developing the survey questions, which were primarily close-ended, allowing participants only three response options. She emphasizes that in the field of social sciences, complex variables like attitudes, perceptions, and feelings can make it challenging to verify the accuracy of participant responses. By using close-ended questions and Likert scale options, however, the survey design simplified data collection and analysis, providing a more straightforward approach to gathering responses across these nuanced variables.
Q: Why do you prefer qualitative research over quantitative?
Dr. Phillips notes her abilities to be limited in numbers. Therefore, she prefers qualitative research because it enables a more in depth exploration of complex issues. While she acknowledges the strain that a barrier like incarceration could create on interpersonal and romantic relationships, she believes that the emotions and personal stories exist and are important to outline through qualitative methods. She also appreciates the human aspect of qualitative research, it values the meaningful conversations that reveal the participants’ genuine emotions and feelings.
Q:What challenges did you face during the research process, particularly in collecting or analyzing data?
She describes that sometimes you start out with a research question and it doesn’t yield the anticipated results. Initial questions can oftentimes not align with the data that is collected. Dr. Phillips notes that researchers may “reverse engineer it”, by coming up with the results they want and then go on to asking the question. What she and the team did was look at the data set and analyze it in different ways with the hope of uncovering a distinction. Generally, there were certain variables they found not to be significant at all which would result in omitting them or refining the research question in order to understand the data from a different angle.

Phillips Table #1 :Statistical Data

Phillips Table #2
Q: Did you encounter any limitations with your data collection methods? How did you address these limitations in your analysis?
As Dr. Jasmine Phillips mentioned in the interview, one limitation of this study is that the data used was quite old between 2008 and 2014. This made the data less relevant and less applicable to current situations. Dr. Jasmine Phillips also pointed out that this is a quantitative study. There was no way to follow up with participants to clarify or further explore their responses. This made it challenging to understand the reasons behind participant’s answers. In addition, Dr. Jasmine Philips emphasized that the study was a snapshot of one day. It was difficult because it didn’t allow her or her colleagues to track participants from the beginning of their relationships or observe how their views might differ before or after. Dr. Jasmine Phillips concluded her answer by mentioning that this was a longitudinal study and would have been insightful with more varied data.
Q: What specific challenges did the participants identify as most significant in maintaining their relationships with incarcerated partners?
Dr. Jasmine Phillips highlighted that while phone access in prison is often seen as a basic issue, it is a significant problem. Many prisons still restrict phone access; when it is available, the cost is astronomical because two or three companies control it. She continues to say that this burden falls heavily on the families outside, particularly on the primary person with income, such as often being women who are also responsible for taking care of children and planning visits. Dr. Phillips added that she supports free phone calls for prisoners and mentions that maintaining contact through these phone calls can play a crucial role in preserving relationships.
Q: How can the study findings help create better support or programs to help women communicate and maintain their relationships with incarcerated partners?
Dr. Jasmine Phillips pointed out that the high cost of phone calls for prisoners harms both relationships and society. While it benefits corporations, it certainly doesn’t help the individuals or families involved, especially when we live in a period where you can easily talk to someone halfway across the world for free. She emphasized the absurdity of continuing to restrict prisoners’ access to communication, as they are already incarcerated and facing numerous challenges. She continues to mention that several states, including California, have begun to address this issue. She believes this is an important issue to pay attention to.
To Conclude…
Dr. Jasmine Phillip’s research highlights how prison-related barriers like expensive phone calls hurt relationships between women and their incarcerated partners. These challenges often create emotional detachment between families, resulting in a loss of connection. Dr. Phillips states that making communication affordable or accessible would help these relationships flourish. As states across the country, including California, begin to address this issue, many families have hope that there will be a better support system for prisoners and their families.
Full Interview with Jasmine Phillips
















